Saturday, May 30, 2009
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
The competent subsidizing the careless--that's classic Democratic Party policy.
From Powerline:
"Historically, it's been a truism that banks don't make money on credit card customers who pay off their bills every month. Instead, revenue has been raised disproportionately from the banks' more feckless customers, in the form of fees, penalties, and--most important, presumably--the high interest rates credit card companies charge on balances. Of course, that is not necessarily unjust, as these same feckless customers cause the most trouble and expense to credit card companies, not to mention the most losses when they can't pay their bill and default.
All of that is about to change, as Congress has just enacted new credit card regulations intended to limit banks' ability to collect money from distressed or incompetent customers. The New York Times explains the consequences:
"It will be a different business," said Edward L. Yingling, the chief executive of the American Bankers Association, which has been lobbying Congress for more lenient legislation on behalf of the nation's biggest banks. "Those that manage their credit well will in some degree subsidize those that have credit problems."
The competent subsidizing the careless--that's classic Democratic Party policy."
Of course, that's not the best part:
"This nugget provides insight into where the Obama administration is coming from on the issue:
Austan Goolsbee, an economic adviser to President Obama, said that while the credit card industry had the right to make a reasonable profit as long as its contracts were in plain language and rule-breakers were held accountable, its current practices were akin to "a series of carjackings."
"The card industry is giving the argument that if you didn't want to be carjacked, why weren't you locking your doors or taking a different road?" Mr. Goolsbee said.
This is stupid to an unusual degree, even by Obama administration standards. Does Obama's economic adviser actually believe that charging fees to credit card borrowers who don't follow the rules is the same is stealing a stranger's car at gunpoint? Maybe so; it's hard to say what this administration could do or say that would surprise us."
The country's in the best of hands.
"Historically, it's been a truism that banks don't make money on credit card customers who pay off their bills every month. Instead, revenue has been raised disproportionately from the banks' more feckless customers, in the form of fees, penalties, and--most important, presumably--the high interest rates credit card companies charge on balances. Of course, that is not necessarily unjust, as these same feckless customers cause the most trouble and expense to credit card companies, not to mention the most losses when they can't pay their bill and default.
All of that is about to change, as Congress has just enacted new credit card regulations intended to limit banks' ability to collect money from distressed or incompetent customers. The New York Times explains the consequences:
"It will be a different business," said Edward L. Yingling, the chief executive of the American Bankers Association, which has been lobbying Congress for more lenient legislation on behalf of the nation's biggest banks. "Those that manage their credit well will in some degree subsidize those that have credit problems."
The competent subsidizing the careless--that's classic Democratic Party policy."
Of course, that's not the best part:
"This nugget provides insight into where the Obama administration is coming from on the issue:
Austan Goolsbee, an economic adviser to President Obama, said that while the credit card industry had the right to make a reasonable profit as long as its contracts were in plain language and rule-breakers were held accountable, its current practices were akin to "a series of carjackings."
"The card industry is giving the argument that if you didn't want to be carjacked, why weren't you locking your doors or taking a different road?" Mr. Goolsbee said.
This is stupid to an unusual degree, even by Obama administration standards. Does Obama's economic adviser actually believe that charging fees to credit card borrowers who don't follow the rules is the same is stealing a stranger's car at gunpoint? Maybe so; it's hard to say what this administration could do or say that would surprise us."
The country's in the best of hands.
Friday, May 15, 2009
Baseball
Milwaukee, Chicago, Cincy, and St. Louis are all within a half game of each other. Doesn't baseball rock?
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Friday, May 8, 2009
Things are crazy...
I've never trusted Barack Obama. I've always thought he was a snake-oil salesman from Chicago. The fact that he survived, nay, thrived, in that corrupt environment just means that he's as corrupt as anyone.
He also uses thug, gangster-like tactics to get his way. He tried with the Chrysler investors, but when they didn't want to take 20 cents to the dollar they invested, he had his boys threaten them with the White House Press Corp to dig up dirt on them. Think about that. the POTUS is using his office to threaten people who don't agree with his policies (and who would lose 80% of their investment)from speaking out. Bush would have been crucified.
However. he's getting static. From, the Business Insider, the story so far.
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-white-house-is-now-refusing-to-respond-to-chrysler-threat-stories-2009-5
He also uses thug, gangster-like tactics to get his way. He tried with the Chrysler investors, but when they didn't want to take 20 cents to the dollar they invested, he had his boys threaten them with the White House Press Corp to dig up dirt on them. Think about that. the POTUS is using his office to threaten people who don't agree with his policies (and who would lose 80% of their investment)from speaking out. Bush would have been crucified.
However. he's getting static. From, the Business Insider, the story so far.
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-white-house-is-now-refusing-to-respond-to-chrysler-threat-stories-2009-5
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)